Analyst PluginMediumSkillv0.12.3

Pricing Power Tracker

Track OEM and brand pricing power — ASP trends mapped to margin signals for equity research

pricing powerASP trendsaverage sale price trendsOEM pricingwhich brands have pricing powerincentive environment
Medium
Complexity
3–5
API Calls
$0.003 – $0.008
MC API Cost
$0.04 – $0.09
Total Cost

Purpose

Pricing power is one of the strongest leading indicators of OEM margin trajectory. An OEM gaining share while maintaining or growing ASP has structural pricing power. One that is growing share via incentives is a margin trap.

Pricing Power Tracker computes average sale price by brand, compares to prior periods, and maps to ticker-level BULLISH (maintaining ASP while growing share) / BEARISH (ASP declining, likely incentive-driven) signals. Identifies which brands are commanding premiums vs discounting to move inventory.

Audience:Equity analystsSector strategistsPortfolio managers focused on auto OEM margins

How It Works

Execution flow. MCP tool calls are shown inline on each step.

↔ Parallel Execution

01a
Current ASP by Makeget_sold_summary

Calls get_sold_summary ranked by make with ranking_measure=average_sale_price for current period. Extracts ASP and sold_count per brand.

01b
Prior Period ASPget_sold_summary

Same call for prior period. Computes ASP change % and volume change % per brand, then aggregates to ticker.

02
Segment ASP Contextget_sold_summary

Calls get_sold_summary per key segment (SUV, Pickup, Sedan) to establish segment average benchmarks. Flags brands above/below segment average.

03
Pricing Power Signal

Assigns PRICING POWER (ASP up + volume up), NEUTRAL (ASP stable), CONCESSION (ASP down + volume up), DEMAND WEAK (ASP down + volume down) per ticker.

MCP Tool Calls

ToolCallsPurpose
get_sold_summary3–5ASP by make current/prior, segment ASP benchmarks

Example Output

PRICING POWER TRACKER — National | February 2026
══════════════════════════════════════════════════

  Ticker  Make(s)               Current ASP  Prior ASP   ASP Δ%    Vol Δ%    Signal
  ──────  ────────────────────  ───────────  ──────────  ────────  ────────  ──────────────
  TM      Toyota/Lexus          $38,200      $37,800     +1.1%     +3.1%     PRICING POWER
  BMWYY   BMW/MINI              $54,700      $54,200     +0.9%     +1.4%     PRICING POWER
  F       Ford/Lincoln          $41,200      $42,100     -2.1%     -4.2%     CONCESSION
  STLA    Jeep/Ram/Dodge        $43,800      $44,300     -1.1%     -2.8%     DEMAND WEAK
  GM      Chevrolet/GMC/Buick   $37,100      $36,900     +0.5%     +2.2%     NEUTRAL

INVESTMENT IMPLICATIONS
  BULLISH on TM, BMWYY — pricing power intact while gaining share
  BEARISH on F — ASP decline suggests incentive spend rising ahead of earnings

Cost Estimate

TierMedium
API Calls3–5
MC API — best$0.003
MC API — worst$0.008
Claude — best$0.03
Claude — worst$0.08
Total range$0.04$0.09

30 analyses/month ≈ $1–3

Limitations

  • US market only.
  • ASP reflects transaction prices (what buyers paid), not manufacturer invoice prices or actual OEM revenue per unit.
  • Mix shift (more trucks vs sedans) can inflate or deflate brand-level ASP independent of true pricing power.
  • Incentive levels are embedded in transaction prices but not explicitly broken out.
Analyst Plugin
View all skills & commands